- Posts: 174
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Fundamentalist wrote: The jinjiang tax issue would probably throw them a little off guard without a standard template answer, but I'm not an expert in china tax rates to ask about it. Furthermore, I am not an investor, and from the recent discussions and studies, I don't think I would even touch it. If you think closing an eye on this issue gives you more confidence in investing, I can't stop you on that.
The only positive so far is that they sponsored a local sports team, which makes sense given they are listed here and badly needs some visibility and investors confidence.
Given the points brought up so far, and the study into the most recent reports, I remain unconvinced. The cliche: If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, but it tries to convince you it is not a duck...... you know what I mean.
Interesting points brought up over past few pages, along with some checks on china tax rates, etc. But this is bringing on a diminishing returns on my time. As such, don't think I will spend any more efforts on this counter unless something interesting pops up again.
Good luck to the minority shareholders here.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nope, like I said, any further homework on this counter is not an effective use of my time and since I'm not vested and not interested, I won't bother on it.newbiestock wrote: fundamentalist, can u summarise in a few sentences what is wrong with the jinjiang tax so I can raise it next monday.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.