China Everbright Water has fallen 62% since hitting a high of $1.27 on 30 May 2014. What gives? (24 Mar 16)

plant3.15China Everbright Water’s (“CEWL”) has tumbled after hitting an intraday high of $1.270 on 30 May 2014 to an intraday low of $0.410 on 21 Jan 2016 (all-time low post share price consolidation since May 2014). It closed at $0.480 on 24 Mar 2016.

This was despite the positives which we have seen in the water industry in China and CEWL.

Is the market overly pessimistic on CEWL, or is there something we do not know?


Background of CEWL

CEWL share price has not performed well after touching an intraday high of $1.270 on 30 May 2014. At that time, CEWL was in the midst of completing the reverse takeover of China Everbright International’s water assets with the issuance of 1.94b shares at $0.703. Upon completion at end-2014, CEWL had a total daily designed capacity of over 3.4 million tons.

Subsequently, CEWL placed out 120.7m new ordinary shares to International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) and Dalvey Asset Holding Ltd (“Dalvey”) at an issue price of $0.940 in Jan 2015. As of end Dec 2015, CEWL has a total daily designed capacity of over 4.6m tons. Despite the developments, CEWL share price continued to slide to an intraday low of $0.410 on 21 Jan 2016 (all time low post share price consolidation since May 2014) before closing at $0.480 on 24 Mar 2016. This was even lower than its NAV per share of $0.495.

Industry prospects remain sanguine

According to the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Plan issued by the State Council of China, China targets at least 70% and 75% of the seven key regions’ water quality to achieve, or exceed the level of Category III by 2020 and 2030, respectively. Furthermore, according to DBS Research, there are more Public-Private Partnership (“PPP”) projects being released with a cumulative investment size of around RMB300b. CEWL is cognizant of the aforementioned vast industry prospects and plans to expand into integrated environmental water business, such as the construction of sponge cities and integrated watershed management etc.

Targets 1.0-1.5mt/d in FY16F; to reach 10mt/d by 2020  

According to the latest analyst reports, CEWL targets an increase of 1.0-1.5mt/d in their total daily designed capacity in FY16F and is on track to reach 10mt/d by 2020.

     ♦ FY16 likely to be a better year

"FY16 is likely to be better than FY15 as FY15’s earnings per share was pulled down by share issuance to IFC and Dalvey.

"FY16 should see better performance on a full year contribution from Dalian Dongda; an improvement in water tariffs, especially from Dalian Tongda with the improvement in discharge standards 
and operational efficiencies afterstreamlining Hankore and Dalian Tongda’s acquisitions."

Although it is premature to say whether CEWL can reach its objectives, it is assuring that firstly, CEWL managed to increase its capacity by 1.1mt/d in FY15. Secondly, its net gearing ratio is at a comfortable level of 41.8% where it has sufficient headroom to gear up for more acquisitions. It is noteworthy that its US$140m loan with IFC announced on 29 Jul 2015 has not been drawn down yet. 


1st dividend in five years, coupled with share buybacks

CEWL has announced a final dividend of S$0.0035 / share, it first dividend payout in five years. Furthermore, CEWL has launched three rounds of share buybacks with a cumulative 7.8m share buyback bought at an average price of $0.493.

These actions likely underscore management’s confidence in CEWL’s business prospects going forward. (See Table 1 below)

Table 1: CEWL’s share buyback


Source: Company

Valuations remain relatively attractive

Based on Table 2 below, CEWL trades at 13.9x FY16F PE and 1.0x FY15 P/BV vis-à-vis the average 15.5x FY16F PE and 1.9x P/BV.

If I exclude CT Env due to its extremely high P/BV, average FY16F and P/BV are 14.4x and 1.4x respectively, CEWL’s valuations seem to be relatively attractive, especially if we take into account its quasi state-ownership, good financials, ample debt headroom.

Table 2: CEWL’s metrics vs other water stocks

Source: Bloomberg & Ernest's compilations as of 24 Mar 2016

Chart analysis

Based on Chart 1 below, CEWL is entrenched in a medium to long term downtrend as evidenced by the declining exponential moving averages (“EMAs”) and the downward sloping trend line. Significant resistance is around $0.485 – 0.510. In the short term, there is a possibility of a potential bullish flag formation being formed. It will be positive if CEWL can break $0.485 – 0.510 with volume expansion and on a sustained basis. If CEWL can break $0.485 – 0.510 with volume expansion and on a sustained basis, it points to an eventual measured technical target of around $0.590. A break below $0.410 with volume expansion and on a sustained basis is negative for the chart.

Near term supports: $0.470 / 0.455 / 0.430

Near term resistances: $0.485 / 0.500 / 0.510

Chart 1: CEWL mired in a medium to long term downtrend

Source: CIMB complimentary chart as of 24 Mar 2016

Risks

Sharp share price decline may portend some negative developments

The sharp 62% share price decline from an intraday high of $1.270 since 30 May 2014 may portend some negative developments which is unknown to me, but (perhaps) known to the market. Readers should exercise their independent judgement and do their own research in this stock before arriving at any investment decision.

Lower than expected additions in CEWL’s total daily designed capacity

Lower than expected additions in CEWL will have an adverse impact in CEWL’s future earnings and their goal of reaching 10mt/d by 2020.

Conclusion

In conclusion, CEWL seems interesting based on positive industry prospects; relatively attractive valuations; quasi state owned with strong financials and ample debt headroom and the possibility of expanding into integrated environmental water business, such as the construction of sponge cities and integrated watershed management etc.

ernest newphotoErnest Lim, CFA, CA Singapore However, the sharp share price decline, possibility of lower than expected additions in CEWL’s total daily designed capacity are some of the noteworthy risks to consider. 

Readers who are interested to know more should refer to the various analyst reports, company financial results and annual reports etc for more information.


Disclaimer
Please refer to the disclaimer here

You may also be interested in:


 

We have 1118 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News